Abstract
Introduction: active learning methodologies are central to education in Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy (MIR), promoting student engagement, autonomy, and collaborative knowledge construction. Within this framework, the integration of simulators and specialised software has emerged as a relevant strategy to enhance training while supporting more sustainable academic practices. This review aimed to identify pedagogical approaches that improve learning outcomes and contribute to environmental and economic sustainability in MIR education. Methods: a narrative literature review was conducted, focusing on active learning methodologies used in radiology and related areas, with particular emphasis on computer-based simulation and software dedicated to technical training. The search encompassed PubMed and ScienceDirect and included studies addressing innovative practices applied to MIR teaching. Results: The results demonstrate that laboratory-based practical training is significantly strengthened through the use of simulators applied to radiology, radiotherapy, and nuclear medicine. The incorporation of digital resources, demonstrative videos, scientific literature, and online assessment supports a more structured learning process. Furthermore, simulation reduces reliance on high-complexity clinical equipment, thereby decreasing financial costs, energy consumption, and CO₂ emissions. systems, whose acquisition, operation and maintenance require substantial financial investment and are associated with high energy consumption and CO₂ emissions. Conclusion: adoption of dedicated software and simulation systems fosters more active, safe and effective learning, enhancing pedagogical quality while reducing the environmental and financial impact associated with the use of clinical equipment. This approach therefore represents a promising pathway towards greater sustainability in MIR education.
References
1. Afzal S, Masroor I. Flipped classroom model for teaching undergraduate students in radiology. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019;29(11):1083–6. doi:10.29271/jcpsp.2019.11.1083.
2. Zhang J, Li J, Zhao W, et al. Application of flipped class based on micro lecture in clinical practice teaching of medical imaging diagnosis. Contin Med Educ. 2019;11:51–4.
3. Faulkner N, Wright B, Lennox A, Bismark M, Boag J, Boffa S, et al. Simulation based training for increasing health service board members' effectiveness: a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):e034994. doi:10.1136/bmjopen 2019 034994.
4. Beam EL, Herstein JJ, Kupzyk KA, Gibbs SG. A simulation approach to measure critical safety behaviors when evaluating training methods for respirator education in healthcare workers. Am J Infect Control. 2020;48(8):869–74. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2020.05.005.
5. Heye T, Knoerl R, Wehrle T, Mangold D, Cerminara A, Loser M, et al. The energy consumption of radiology: energy and cost saving opportunities for CT and MRI operation. Radiology. 2020;295:593–605.
6. Sumner C, Ikuta I, Garg T, Martin J, Mansoori B, Chalian M, et al. Approaches to greening radiology. Acad Radiol. 2023;30:528–35.
7. Anudjo M, Vitale C, Elshami W, Hancock A, Adeleke S, Franklin J, et al. Considerations for environmental sustainability in clinical radiology and radiotherapy practice: a systematic literature review and recommendations for a greener practice. Radiography. 2023;29:1077–92.
8. Barloese M, Petersen C. Sustainable health care: a real world appraisal imaging department. Clin Imaging. 2024;105:110025. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124000080
9. Ge L, Chen Y, Yan C, Chen Z, Liu J. Effectiveness of flipped classroom vs traditional lectures in radiology education. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(40):e22430. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000022430.
10. Qi Y, Liu Z, Zhao P. The application of flipped classroom combined with small lectures in radiation practice teaching. Contin Med Educ. 2019;11:40–2.
11. Wang Y. Research on the application of flipped classroom in medical image teaching under seminar teaching mode. China Health Ind. 2019;21:117–8.
12. Xie W, Zhao W, Li Z, et al. The application of flipped classroom combined with WeChat in medical imaging teaching. Contin Med Educ. 2019;11:25–7.
13. Shetty S, Bhat S, Al Bayatti S, Al Kawas S, Talaat W, El Kishawi M, Al Rawi N, Narasimhan S, Al Daghestani H, Madi M, Shetty R. The scope of virtual reality simulators in radiology education: systematic literature review. JMIR Med Educ. 2024;10:e52953. doi:10.2196/52953.
14. Schram AL, Bonne NL, Brink Henriksen T, Thomas Hertel N, Petersen PG, Bjerrum MC, et al. Effect of simulation based team training on sick leave among healthcare professionals: a multisite controlled follow up study. J Healthc Simul. 2025;X:X–X.
15. Couarraze S, Saint Jean M, Decormeille G, Houze Cerfon CH, Minville V, Fourcade O, et al. Short term effects of simulation training on stress, anxiety and burnout in critical care health professionals: before and after study. Clin Simul Nurs. 2023;75:25–32.
16. Schram A, Jensen HI, Gamborg M, Lindhard M, Rölfing J, Kjaergaard Andersen G, et al. Exploring the relationship between simulation based team training and sick leave among healthcare professionals: a cohort study across multiple hospital sites. BMJ Open. 2023;13(10):e076163. doi:10.1136/bmjopen 2023 076163.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Nélia Gaudêncio, Magda Ramos, António Abrantes, Claudia Oliveira (Author)